The site is made of tutorials that cover a number of areas for advanced internet users. In my opinion it is published more for the use of teachers at the Institute than the general internet user, but it does provide some useful information for others as well. It provides practical exercises to ensure your understanding of the tutorials. It provides a link that indicates what the purpose of the website and who it is directed at.
I dont believe that the information contained in the website is a current as it could be due to the fact that the copyright happened in the year 2000. I cant see any other date that indicates that information has been updated since then. However the links that are contained in the site are functional.
I used the A9 function to give me an indication of the type of people who visit this site, the people who visit this page also visit a number of other educational sites.
Compare your final analysis and annotation with the material you saved for the last task, and think about these questions :
In terms of your own future use, which 'body ' of information (ie. the original 'snapshot' of the site, or your own, annotated, analytical version) would be most useful to refer back to?
I think that the credibility of the site has a lot to do with how useful the site actually is. I would refer to the about us links and look further into who published and wrote the information contained in the site. I would also need to decide what the mission of the site was to see if it was the kind of information that I wanted to use.
In term of external users (i.e. if you included this site as a hyperlink or resource on a website) which body of information would best help them judge if the site was useful or of interest to them?
No comments:
Post a Comment